Opinion: Desert Solitaire Is More Relevant Than Ever

A half-century on, the book’s message stands in high, acidic relief.


Fifty years ago, Edward Abbey’s Desert Solitaire was published to decent reviews but little fanfare. “Another book dropped down the bottomless well. Into oblivion,” wrote a disheartened Abbey in his journal February 6, 1968.

Yet it has remained in print for a half-century and created a devoted following. After President Donald Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke carved 2 million acres out of Bears Ears and Grand-Staircase-Escalante national monuments, both in the heart of “Abbey Country,” Desert Solitaire remains more relevant today than ever.

An account of Abbey’s time as a ranger in what is now Arches National Park, Desert Solitaire is both memoir and a passionate defense of our nation’s last unspoiled land. In spirit, though, his book resembles a 1960s nonfiction novel. Sometimes howlingly funny, it compresses the two postwar decades Abbey spent in Utah and Arizona into a single “season in the wilderness.”

“Do not jump in your automobile next June and rush out to the canyon country hoping to see some of that which I have attempted to evoke in these pages,” he famously wrote. “In the first place, you can’t see anything from a car; you’ve got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk, better yet crawl, on hands and knees, over the sandstone and through the thornbush and cactus. When traces of blood begin to mark your trail, you’ll see something, maybe. Probably not. In the second place most of what I write about in this book is already gone or going under fast. This is not a travel guide but an elegy.”

By the time Abbey wrote that, his beloved Glen Canyon was “going under fast,” gurgling beneath Lake Powell as the Glen Canyon Dam plugged the Colorado River’s flow. The fact that Arches and Canyonlands national monuments would later become national parks was of little comfort to Abbey, who in Desert Solitaire bemoans what he termed the “industrial tourism” that revolves around the automobile.

Compared to Abbey’s fierce opposition to modern capitalism, Bernie Sanders comes off as comparatively milquetoast. Above all, Abbey was an opponent of “that cloud on my horizon” he defined as progress. This wasn’t Luddism so much as a deep need to preserve a small portion of America as wilderness, kept forever free from development, beginning with precisely those areas of southern Utah attacked by Trump and Zinke.

Desert Solitaire was published four years after the Wilderness Act was signed into law. Even as the United States’ economy boomed, in 1964 Congress sanctified areas where “the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.” Abbey fought to preserve such land for the rest of his life.

“Wilderness complements and completes civilization,” he wrote in the 1980s. “I might say that the existence of wilderness is a compliment to civilization. Any society that feels itself too poor to afford the preservation of wilderness is not worthy of the name of civilization.”

As Trump and Zinke reclaim for extractive industry much of the land that had been protected through the Antiquities Act by Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, Abbey’s spirit infuses the opposition. More than a few dog-eared and well-thumbed paperback copies of his book were probably in the backpacks of the thousands protesting Trump on December 4, when he arrived in Salt Lake City to announce his land grab.

But Abbey, who died in 1989, wouldn’t be surprised by Trump and Zinke’s attitudes. He’d instantly spot them as more of the know-nothing exploiters he’d always railed against. It also wouldn’t surprise him that drilling in the Alaska National Wilderness Refuge was the price the GOP paid to secure Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s vote for tax reform. Having called the cattlemen whose herds graze on public land “welfare queens,” he’d appreciate being vindicated by Cliven Bundy, recently on trial in Nevada for crimes that began with his refusal to pay his federal grazing fees.

He’d probably also say, “What else did you expect?” after learning that so many tourists in cars are entering Arches, Grand Teton, Bryce and Zion national parks that buses and reservation systems have begun or are in the works. And I think he’d be saddened that, 50 years after the publication of Desert Solitaire, the assault on public lands — our lands — remains such a fact of American life.

John Buckley is a contributor to Writers on the Range, the opinion service of High Country News. He is a Washington novelist and CEO of Subject Matter, a creative advocacy firm. Photo by Wayne Hsieh

Lost your copy of Desert Solitaire? Pick up a new one here. Better yet, go to the library or find a used copy.

 

Showing 10 comments
  • Bonnie Abzug
    Reply

    Hayduke Lives

  • Dan
    Reply

    Edward Abbey exploited the desert wilderness for his on personal monetary gains,more than any other person or industry period. And the newest generation of Abbey followers have no real idea how much distruction industrial tourism is causing

    • Nick H
      Reply

      Care to explain how you came to these conclusions?

    • EB
      Reply

      Dan
      Chill

    • Greg
      Reply

      Read Jim Stiles’ “Brave New West” to understand Abbey and the situation.

    • Dave King
      Reply

      More than any other person or industry? This is just absurdly false.

    • John
      Reply

      Your statement is wrong and sounds like it comes from a Russian troll. The ones who exploited the desert wilderness for their own monetary gains more than any person or period are the ones who paid Zinke and Trump to remove protections from the American people’s lands in Utah. I recommend learning more on the topic before posting your drunken jibberish.

  • Tom T.
    Reply

    Dan, Abbey exploited the desert wilderness for his own personal monetary gain than any other person or industry? Please explain. He was not a rich man.

  • jr
    Reply

    Hey Dan: So Abbey exploited the wilderness more than the extraction industry? More than damming rivers? More than road building? You have any proof of that? What are some of the scars on the land that Abbey put in for personal gain? Aside from writing about his experiences and being paid for his books, how did he gain anything, much less destroy anything?
    Sure tourism has it’s impacts, you can’t blame that on Abbey, it’s because there are many places that people want to see.
    I think you need to slow down a bit and deal with realities.

  • Accidental FIRE
    Reply

    I’ve been to most of the desert parks and monuments in the US, including Grand Staircase right after it was christened, and nothing gives me more awe than a massive, quiet desert.

    From Arches to Bryce, from Zion to Capitol Reef, and Canyonlands to Joshua Tree, my nights out in the desert have left a bigger mark on me than any other experiences.

Leave a Comment

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This