AJ 17 FEATURE

The New Clean Climbing

In the era of #MeToo and #TimesUp, should offensive route names be sanitized?

Smith Rock has mostly non-offensive route names, including Last Waltz (5.12c). Photo by Tara Kehrzer

You mustn’t print it.

Though the invisible waves of cellular technology and just over a thousand miles separated us, I could swear that Jeff Smoot was blushing. The “it” in question referred to the translation of a now-retired, extremely vulgar route name at Oregon’s Smith Rock that the climber and author had just deciphered for me as a lewd riff on the purist aesthetics of one of the sport’s most celebrated figures.

It wasn’t his crude epithet; I’d asked Smoot, who spent two decades researching some of the sport’s wildest antics for his book Hangdog Days, to tell me about its practitioners’ infamous penchant for sophomoric lexicon. “Back in the day, the route names that were offensive were usually tongue-in-cheek—an inside joke, a play on words of some kind, or maybe a statement about how they didn’t like a particular climber,” he said. “Even though you might

1,400 words to go

You’re just getting to the good part.

This story — and 41 issues of them — opens with a subscription.

Either one picks up right where you left off.

Join 7,000+ readers · Independently owned · Since 2008

Adventure Journal — Print Quarterly
Stories like this, in your hands four times a year.

41 issues. 10 years. Independently owned. Printed on 70lb uncoated paper with a soft-touch cover, solar-powered, and shipped in a brown paper envelope. Free domestic shipping.

Subscribe — $80/year Or try a single issue for $25

There is nothing else like it. — AJ subscriber