If there is one constant in backpacking it is this: Fewer things are better than more things. There are of course exceptions. More Sour Patch Kids are always better than fewer Sour Patch Kids after a 15-mile day on the trail. That might be the only exception now that I think about it. So, yeah, generally, you’re going to want to avoid doubling up on things you really only need one of.
Along these lines, a recent discovery of mine is paring down trekking poles to just one pole when on a backcountry trip. This is clearly a concept as old as walking itself but it is also one that many backpackers have apparently forgotten or ignored. At least young-ish, gear-obsessed backpackers. I’m not talking about carting along a knotted wizard staff like Gandalf on the trail (though that’s very cool if it’s your thing) or even buying a fancy carbon hiking staff. You already have what you need.
The concept is quite simple. As you’re packing for a backpacking trip, pull out your trekking poles and then—here’s the crucial part—put one of them back. Just bring the other one. Easy, right?
I realized this made far more sense than bringing two on a backpacking trip last summer when I broke one of the nuts that tightens the telescoping action on one of the poles midway through the first day’s hike. (I’m a really big fan of these inexpensive and typically sturdy Cascade Mountain Tech poles—the breakage was my fault for tightening the nut with my multitool). At first, I was extremely bummed that my pole was broken and for a time I tried to use a branch as a replacement so that I’d still have the stability of a four-legged animal that two poles provide. But that quickly got old, and I pitched the branch.
Shepherds have been using just the one pole (staff) for thousands of years. Maybe they’ve been onto something. Photo: Eshtiaghyi
Turns out though, one pole is plenty. Unless you’re balancing 70 pounds on your back while walking over loose scree, I’m not really sure why you’d ever actually need two poles. One provides plenty of support and stability.
River crossings are nearly as easy with just one. In fact, fly anglers carry only one to to keep themselves upright in thigh-deep, fast-flowing rivers and they’re just fine. When climbing or descending steep rocky sections of a trail, you can use both hands as leverage on the one pole and it works nearly as well as having both. Plus you have one hand free to grab your phone for a photo, to pull out a map or GPS, to bandana sweat off your brow, or to stuff your face with a Sour Patch Kid. It’s also easier to pretend you’re a foil-wielding fencer with just the one.
Are you using a tent that requires two trekking poles to set up? You can just bring a small tent pole, like this lightweight carbon fiber pole from Easton, folded up in your bag. Or transition to a tent that requires just a single pole. Or, if you’re hiking with two, either use your partner’s poles if they’re stubbornly insisting on using two or convert them to the Church of the One Pole and combine your poles to erect the tent.
As great as trekking poles can be, it’s pretty great to have one hand free on the trail. Whether you just stick it in your pocket or gesticulate wildly at the beauty of nature, you’ll be stoked at the freedom and unburdened of one additional piece of fancy camp gear.
Call me old fashioned, but what’s wrong with just finding a nice stick and using it for the hike then tossing it back into the woods when you’re done? That said, I know some folks with knee problems that probably couldn’t backpack without trekking poles.
Nothing at all wrong with that! The stiffness, strength, and lightness of a carbon pole though is great. Plus, lots of backpackers use tents that require trekking poles for support.
Jim, also this: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/rabbit-holes/people-are-stacking-too-many-stones
What might have been okay once is far less okay now that so many people are enjoying the outdoors. Best to leave as little trace of our passing as possible, and that includes helping sticks migrate.
Yes, that is what we do all the time, as long as you are in bush areas where there are good stable straightish ones.
Having had couple shoulder replacement surgeries (both shoulders), I like using poles to strengthen my arms, as well as shoulders. Of course, it is important to know how to use the poles when walking (point basket end toward the back and actually push down when planting the pole, so that the muscles actually engage). Personal preference is the key—I would feel lopsided with one pole—as I definitely prefer to be a four-legged animal.
From a purely stability standpoint, I can see how someone may prefer just one pole vs. two. However, years ago I remember reading actual academic research papers talking about the benefits of two poles, like how people generally have a longer stride when using two, how the impact forces on your legs are more reduced when using two, etc. I’d have to dig for them now, but know it’s been studied.
When I had a knee injury, my two poles is what got me back out quicker. I think one would have caused imbalance, too, as I would have favored one side too much.
I’m an amputee so poles are a real thing for me. I’m also a committed tripod: that is I use a single pole. When I tried two poles I used them as outriggers. My wrists were through the straps and I was always fumbling around trying to make the right placements. When I went the tripod route life got a lot better. Now I use the pole as a long cane with my palm over top of the grip. No strap. That way it is easy to switch hands, which I do all the time, and then I have my free hand for balancing or pushing off rocks and trees. I can load a ton of weight on the top of the pole for step downs and pushups, much more than I could with two poles. Try it.
Weight of pack may be key: Using poles years ago would have saved many NOLS instructors’ knees. I’ve carried an 83 lb pack with no poles (they were not heard of back then), and I now use two poles while backpacking with a 30-40 lb pack. I go back and forth with/without poles for dayhikes, though usually it’s no poles unless doing some off-trail hiking. So…before advocating for no or one pole, consider your future knees. You may not need the poles for balance now, but down the road, as you continue hiking/backpacking, your future 65-year-old knees just might thank you for your past care, and you might still have your original knees, unlike me!