The Budget Super Committee’s Ax Could Fall on…National Parks

by michael frank on November 17, 2011 · 4 comments

4 responses

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park

National parks cost every American about $8 per head per year. And parks contribute about $13.2 billion to the economy, even as they received $2.6 billion in funding for 2011, an amount which already was cut $140 million. Overall funding for the NPS has been cut by $400 million since 2001. Nobody in this space would argue that the parks aren’t a freaking bargain, but under the recent budget agreement, if the so-called Super Committee in congress cannot find $1.3 trillion to excise from national spending, there are threatened across-the-board cuts of 9 percent — that’s $231 million more cut from the parks. This might be the last straw, because the parks are all massively hamstrung already, with a backlog of $3.7 billion in critical maintenance (that’d be stuff like roads and building safety), and are incredibly short-staffed, too. If the park system is a bargain right now, that’s also a mirage, because it’s crumbling under the weight of unprecedented traffic (281 million visitors in 2010, nearly 90 percent of the population of this country).

If this avalanche of numbers leaves you a little numb, a new report by the National Parks Conservation Association puts matters in a starker light, explaining where we are now — and how untenable the situation will get next summer if the mandatory budget ax of the Super Committee falls on the NPS. The now is pretty ugly:

* The Park Service’s budget for construction and routine maintenance is $325 million short of what the agency needs. Parks like Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon are grossly underfunded for maintaining clean water and sewage treatment, as well as roofs, foundations, and roads.

* Budget cuts prompted Wrangell-St. Elias officials to reduce their seasonal employment ranks by 24 positions for the summer of 2011.

* Zion has precisely one ranger on staff to respond night emergencies for the entire park.

* Lack of funding at Acadia National Park has left 15 permanent staff positions unfilled.

* Blue Ridge Parkway’s budget allows for just 170 of its 240 allocated full-time positions to be filled. Just 10 permanent interpretive rangers are on staff for the parkway’s 14 visitor contact facilities.

* Because of zeroed-out funding for land acquisition, at Valley Forge, George Washington’s headquarters were nearly sold to private development.

More broadly, the NPCA report warns that further cuts could result in campground, visitor center, and interpretive center closures, field trips being turned away, and for the potential for looting and vandalism to increase (the NPS has already warned that they don’t have the resources to inventory the historical artifacts it has, so losses may be happening now, because there’s no accurate record of the items). There’s also concern that fewer cops will result in more illegal drug trafficking and growing within park boundaries, and that monitoring and protection of endangered species will fall further behind, even at risk of violating federal law.

While Americans view Congress with a very dim eye, 85 percent of Americans favor the full funding of national parks. It’s unlikely that that will translate into adding back the $400 million the NPS has lost since 2001′s budget, but it’s also just as plain that any additional cuts may actually lead to park closures, perhaps after someone gets hurt because infrastructure isn’t maintained or rangers aren’t employed to guide people or to respond to emergencies.

In cooperation with National Parks Traveler. Environmental coverage made possible in part by support from Patagonia. For information on Patagonia and its environmental efforts, visit www.patagonia.com.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

D November 17, 2011 at 09:11

Yeah that sucks but NPS wont exist if this country goes broke. We could cut every penny from the NPS and still do nothing to help this huge debt. Everyone is going to feel the pain eventually its just a matter of how long until we grow up and how bad will it be?

Glen November 17, 2011 at 12:29

If the spend is $8 per person, and the number of visitors is %90 of total population – then why not just increase the fees and make it user pays?
I’m from NZ, and have just (last weekend!) returned from 3 *busy* weeks of visiting your incredible national parks. (Yosemite, Death Valley, Lake Mead, Zion, Bryce, Capitol Reef, Canyonlands, Arches, Joshua Tree) – all for the price of $80. For two people, thats good value….
One thing that struck me (other than the ‘massiveness’ of some of the landscapes) – is the fact that you can drive almost everywhere, (within 10/15mins walk of many ‘highlights’). Compare that to a typical NZ National Park – there are some dirt roads, but for %90 of the parks, if you want to see the sites – you need to walk in.
I realize there is a different climate, different infrastructure etc here – but to see NZ’s parks – you will end up staying in back country huts (maintained by our equivalent of your NPS). You need to hike in, carry your gear, hike out.

This approach does make it cheaper to maintain, but it does mean there is no way that our parks could cope with the number of visitors that US parks handle….. It also means there is less people that can experience our national parks, as they are not as accessible as in the US.
I dont know what the answer is, but im certain that you could spend less, and achieve more – but it would mean a change of access/experience in some parks.

Francois November 17, 2011 at 15:13

We can’t afford to have decent US parks, because we are paying for a war to bring more oil from Iraq… that oil destroys natural parks, either through car emissions or gas spills. I am glad I am paying taxes.

D November 18, 2011 at 10:12

The war for oil idea is a joke. If you want to make that argument, you should say war for big military contracts. That’s where they are getting rich. I wish we would take some of their oil the fact is we don’t. We get all the spoils of war and none of the riches. The only ones getting rich is the military industrial complex. Is war right or wrong, that’s another debate all together? The bottom line is we are broke and it doesn’t matter how good the deal is if you have no money. I can offer to sell you my car for a dollar, but if you don’t have that dollar it doesn’t matter.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: