Outdoor Retailer Sneak Peek: Vibram Five Fingers for Spring 2012

by steve casimiro on August 5, 2011 · 8 comments

8 responses

Reporting from Outdoor Retailer Summer Market, Salt Lake City, Utah.

COMPETITORS LAUGHED WHEN VIBRAM introduced the first Five Fingers not-a-shoe a few years ago, but then they saw the popularity in barefoot running and copied it, at least as much as they could while Vibram was aggressively defending Five Fingers’ patents. But then came a few products that, while derivative, pushed the idea of barefoot running in places Vibram hadn’t gone. Well, the originator’s new minimalist footwear for 2012 answers the competition loud and clear, pushing the scope at both ends.

The SeeYa ($100) strips materials to their minimal. It’s still a long way from the silicone foot condom that is Inov-8′s Evoskin, but the sole is thinner, there’s less support, less sole, less of everything, all designed to get closer to the true barefoot running effect without exposing your dogs to the sharp and nasties of the world. There’s a skoch of padding in the polyurethane insole, enough to take the edge off, and of course a thin Vibram sole, but still, the SeeYa should provide the most natural barefoot feel in the brand’s now-extensive line.

At the other end is a pure trail running model. It’s ironic, really, that Five Fingers has different models — barefoot is barefoot, right? — but when things are stripped as close to nothing as they are with these shoes, subtleties make a big difference. So the Spyridon ($120) is designed for off-road thrashing, mainly by adding beefier (relatively speaking) lugs. And coloring it brown with wild swirls. The sole is 3.5mm, which is Vibram’s bread-and-butter density, so I’m curious, actually, how and whether it differs from the Bikila, in which I’ve logged most of my FF miles.

vibram five fingers seeya adventure journal

For more, visit the Vibram Five Fingers website.

ALL SNEAK PEAKS OF SPRING ’12 GEAR HERE

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Oliver Ramirez August 5, 2011 at 11:33

:=)

Reply

Heather Knight August 5, 2011 at 11:36

Not a fan of the lace-ups. I have a pair of the Bikilas and I like them but don’t feel like I get as tight a fit as I could have.

Reply

Jimmy Buff August 5, 2011 at 12:13

but wouldn’t laces help that? I’m curious about the laces myself.

Reply

D Patterson August 5, 2011 at 18:46

One of the major thinmgs that the purists BF people will say – is put anything on the foot that insulates the foot/ground interface and you are messing around with proprioception. When will VF look into outting a propriocpetive insole like Barefoot Sceince into their shoe to enhance the real interface feeling

Reply

robi August 29, 2011 at 15:18

Until they start calling these things five TOES, I won’t take them as anything but gimmick.

Reply

Jake September 13, 2011 at 11:59

@Robi What does the name have to do with anything? And though the difference is perhaps more subtle on the flat man-made surfaces most walk on today … I still think humans have seperated toes for a reason. If they did nothing for balance, grip, tactile feedback, etc. it would probably not be worth the risk of breaks / stubs / strains for us to have them.

Reply

Keith November 25, 2011 at 19:51

@robi,
The name fivefingers is translated from italian. In italian, the word for fingers & toes is the same. In rough translation, finger is: dito and toe is: dito del piede (or finger of the foot).

Reply

PercyJ January 5, 2012 at 12:16

I got the bikila and classics and love them both. I prefer the classic for travel or just hanging out, but the bikilas are my favorite workout shoe.

I just saw a post for the 2010 styles. Have they discontinued the classics?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: