Soft-spoken, bespectacled Jim Smith makes an unlikely activist. The former Mobil Oil geophysicist retired to Sedona, Arizona, about 10 years ago, drawn by the spectacular red-rock scenery. In November 2009, Smith drove five miles of rough road to the Vultee Arch trailhead and backpacked in for a night. When he returned, he found the Forest Service had ticketed him for failing to buy a Red Rock Pass.
Rather than simply mailing a check, Smith did some research. Then he challenged the citation in federal court.
Last September, he won. U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Aspey ruled that the Coconino National Forest could not charge recreation fees at undeveloped trailheads or other sites that did not offer certain amenities, like toilets or picnic tables. The Coconino has since stopped charging fees at more remote trailheads. It’s also held two public meetings, and in June released two alternative fee scenarios. Coincidentally, the Forest Service announced on February 25 that it would conduct a nationwide internal review of its recreation fee areas.
Smith says he challenged his ticket on behalf of those who “have a hard time affording fees.” Kitty Benzar, president of the Western Slope No Fee Coalition, is more effusive. “Jim Smith,” she says, “is a hero to a lot of people.”
The Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management were first authorized to charge access fees through the 1996 Recreational Fee Demonstration Program. Local agencies needed money to reduce a huge maintenance backlog; at least 80 percent of the fees would be used on the land where they were collected. But many people resented the program, arguing that public lands should remain, well, public. Cities, counties, and state legislatures including Oregon’s and Idaho’s passed resolutions condemning it and complaining about charges for access to undeveloped areas.
The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA), passed in 2004, repealed the Fee Demo program and restricted fees to sites that provide amenities. But the Forest Service retained many of the same fee programs it had created under Fee Demo — even in areas lacking services. The agency came up with a new designation called “High Impact Recreation Areas,” or HIRAs, which lump together primitive sites with nearby sites that do have amenities, creating chunks of land where fees could be collected. There are 95 HIRAs across the country, mostly in the West. They are often huge: Sedona’s Red Rock fee area, for example, encompasses 160,000 acres.
Since FLREA also allows federal agencies to charge fees for “specialized recreation uses…such as group activities” and “recreation events,” the BLM took a different approach, requiring paid permits at roughly 20 primitive but sensitive sites throughout the West, like Utah’s Cedar Mesa and Arizona’s Paria Canyon. Benzar calls this the “black hole” in the law.
No-fee activists say the Smith decision has re-energized them. Matt Kenna, an attorney with the Western States Legal Foundation who represents plaintiffs challenging fees at Mount Lemmon outside Tucson and Mount Evans west of Denver, says it’s helped in both cases. District court rulings aren’t binding precedents, but Kenna calls it “a fresh, well-reasoned decision.”
Still, it’s unclear how the decision will affect the Forest Service at large. The head of the agency, Tom Tidwell, says system-wide reviews were already being planned, but acknowledges that Smith’s case “was another indicator that we need to take a look” at the fee areas. The agency completed the reviews in late May, but says it’s too early to reveal what recommendations might result.
Given flat recreation budgets and skyrocketing visitation, some say access fees are likely here to stay. Nationwide, the Forest Service collects over $60 million annually in fees, about 20 percent of its total “Recreation, Heritage and Wilderness” budget. The money is funneled back into maintenance, safety, visitor education and more. In Sedona, Red Rock Pass revenue pays for managing the nation’s largest national forest volunteer team, which does everything from pick up trash to help maintain trails. And the fee program is fairly lean: No more than 15 percent is used for administrative and other overhead costs.
The local program generated just over $1 million in 2010. That’s a lot of money; the Red Rock District received only about $400,000 in federal recreation funds that same year. The fees are critical for protecting a fragile ecosystem that hosts a million and a half visitors every year, says Coconino Recreation Staff Officer Jennifer Burns. If there aren’t established trails, hikers create their own by tramping over sensitive soils, she says. “The Red Rock Pass in this day and age is a necessity. I would hate to see it go away.”
In affiliation with High Country News. This environmental coverage made possible in part by support from Patagonia. For information on Patagonia and its environmental efforts, visit www.patagonia.com.

Wallpaper Wednesday: New Zealand Dew
Solar-Powered Catamaran Makes 1st Circumnavigation
The Daily Bike, May 16, 2012
Street Artist Pastes Healing in Navajo Nation
Dirtbag Gourmet: Margaritas with Climber Kelly Cordes
Links We Like, May 16, 2012
Shelter Co. Is A Sweet Way to Camp
Fracking, Congress Endanger America’s Rivers
The Daily Bike, May 15, 2012
Declination: Dancing With Unexploded Bombs in Laos
The List: 10 Famous Bears
Links We Like, May 15, 2012
Why You Should Row Across the Atlantic
Gear Review: Chris King Coffee Tamper
Yellowstone’s Grizzlies are More Dangerous Than Glacier’s


{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
As much as I dislike paying for a trailhead permit, I’m not sure the money to maintain these beloved places is going to come from anywhere else.
I don’t despise them. I volunteer 16 hours a year (trails) and get a free annual parking pass to the White Mountain National Forest (NH). Also it provides funding that goes back into the National Forest in question.
How can he not see himself as a freeloader?. He’s not a hero, he’s a bum. He wants the whole place protected, open, and well-maintained for him, but he doesn’t want to pay a fee (which, in a National Forest, is usually very inexpensive). The USFS and DOI already don’t have money for the huge backlog of needed maintenance projects, much less for new development. Magical trail fairies don’t keep these awesome places open.
I do like that you explained the budget and the numbers associated with the fees. It would have packed more punch if you’d included the insurmountable sum of money for a Red Rocks Pass that Smith has protected from those who have a “hard time affording fees.” $5.00 for a day, or, if you’re a quantity discount type a guy, $20.00 for a year.
I am honestly curious what the fine was on Smith’s ticket; what’s the fine for not having a Red Rocks Pass displayed?
Smith’s outrage would be better directed at those institutions and individuals who seem so bent on destroying wild lands. Maybe he should busy himself reminding his representative and senators that no one was ever elected to trash America’s precious public lands. Smith is out of step with the heart of America, where reasonable fees to protect such places are certainly favored. Any of us who enter our natural places are consumptive users of those places, and fees for such use are appropriate.